This year we are both thinking about the horrors of WW1 and potentially staring down the barrel of another global conflict with the rapid rise of ISIS, a regime that parallels at least in its evil conduct, the heinous Nazi regime. But was waging war on the Nazis the right thing to do? Isn't the evil of these ideologies justification for war, and as a result isn't such a war just? Well yes and no, but You have to understand that I am coming from the position of a pacifist, which is quite unusual considering I come from a family of "warriors." Let me deal first with my take on "pacifist"; for me this does not mean I will avoid war at all and any cost, it means that I will not sit back act as a peacemaker and watch nations descend into war! No, I will make every effort to avoid war with the realisation that sometimes war becomes inevitable.
So back the question 'can there be a just war?" In Romans 3:10 Paul quotes Psalm 14 "as it is written: "None is righteous, no, not one" and my argument is that the unrighteous cannot prosecute a just war. God is righteous so a war prosecuted by him, or by those he commands to do so can be just. In WW2 there were people on both sides who claimed God was on their side. In the case of the war on ISIS both the "Christian" West and Muslim ISIS claim to have God on their side, yet neither are just in their actions. So neither WW2 nor the war on ISIS can claim to be just. "Can I really believe my eyes, does Simon really think that?"
Do not adjust your set!
A history lesson: Let's start with WW1, an unavoidable war apparently because of the tensions caused by imperialism, and ambition that is brought about by too much power. A war that can only be described as disgusting. The end of the war that resulted in defeat of Germany and her allies was marked by a surrender that the victors ensured was both deliberately humiliating and economically disastrous For Germany. It was this environment caused by Britain and its allies that gave birth to the evils of Nazism. This then brings us to Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan and all the other countries in that area: for decades after WW2 the Super-Powers of the U.S., USSR and their respective allies exerted their power and influence in these areas for their own gain. This without a care for what the conditions they were creating as they promoted and supported various despots financially and militarily. The first evidence perhaps of the long term effect of this was the backlash and eventual deposing of the Shah of Iran and in his place the hardline Ayatollah Khomeini. Saddam Hussein, the House of Saud in Saudi, the Al-Assad family in Syria etc. etc. are all products of the Wests interference with ISIS a direct result of the activities of these regimes. A localised war to get rid of the Saddam Hussein who could no longer be controlled by the Super-Powers has destabilised the entire region and now we are in a position where a bigger and more extensive war is necessary to try and reestablish some sort of normality.
My personal conclusion is that WW2 was necessary, as I believe is the prosecution of war on ISIS, but are these wars just, not in my humble opinion.